Author
Listed:
- Ana Luiza Valle Martins
- Filippo Annoni
- Filipe Alex da Silva
- Lucas Bolais-Ramos
- Gisele Capanema de Oliveira
- Renata Cunha Ribeiro
- Mirella Monique Lana Diniz
- Thuanny Granato Fonseca Silva
- Beatriz Dias Pinheiro
- Natália Abdo Rodrigues
- Alana Helen dos Santos Matos
- Daisy Motta-Santos
- Maria José Campagnole-Santos
- Thiago Verano-Braga
- Fabio Silvio Taccone
- Robson Augusto Souza Santos
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus-related disease (COVID-19) is mainly characterized by a respiratory involvement. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has a relevant role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19, as the virus enters host’s cells via the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Methods: This investigator-initiated, seamless phase 1–2 randomized clinical trial was conceived to test the safety and efficacy of continuous short-term (up to 7 days) intravenous administration of Angiotensin-(1–7) in COVID-19 patients admitted to two intensive care units (ICU). In addition to standard of care, intravenous administration of Angiotensin-(1–7) was started at 5 mcg/Kg day and increased to 10 mcg/Kg day after 24 h (Phase 1; open label trial) or given at 10 mcg/Kg day and continued for a maximum of 7 days or until ICU discharge (Phase 2; double-blind randomized controlled trial). The rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) served as the primary outcome of the study for Phase 1, and the number of oxygen free days (OFDs) by day 28 for Phase 2. Results: Between August 2020 and July 2021, when the study was prematurely stopped due to low recruitment rate, 28 patients were included in Phase 1 and 79 patients in Phase 2. Of those, 78 were included in the intention to treat analysis, and the primary outcome was available for 77 patients. During Phase 1, one SAE (i.e. bradycardia) was considered possibly related to the infusion, justifying its discontinuation. In Phase 2, OFDs did not differ between groups (median 19 [0–21] vs. 14 [0–18] days; p = 0.15). When patients from both phases were analyzed in a pooled intention to treat approach (Phase 1–2 trial), OFDs were significantly higher in treated patients, when compared to controls (19 [0–21] vs. 14 [0–18] days; absolute difference −5 days, 95% CI [0–7] p = 0.04). Conclusions: The main findings of our study indicate that continuous intravenous infusion of Angiotensin-(1–7) at 10 mcg/Kg day in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU with severe pneumonia is safe. In Phase II intention to treat analysis, there was no significant difference in OFD between groups. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04633772—Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, UTN number: U1111-1255-7167.
Suggested Citation
Ana Luiza Valle Martins & Filippo Annoni & Filipe Alex da Silva & Lucas Bolais-Ramos & Gisele Capanema de Oliveira & Renata Cunha Ribeiro & Mirella Monique Lana Diniz & Thuanny Granato Fonseca Silva &, 2024.
"Angiotensin-(1–7) infusion in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU: a seamless phase 1–2 randomized clinical trial,"
ULB Institutional Repository
2013/378555, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
Handle:
RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/378555
Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/378555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.