IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-371811.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative advantage and competitiveness in a small, ‘open' economy

Author

Listed:
  • Mathew P.K.M. Tharakan
  • Jean Waelbroeck
  • D. Verstralen
  • A. Sendhaji

Abstract

The neo-factor proportions theory suggests that the concordance between the endowment of human capital and the human capital intensity of the production process is an important determinant of the commodity composition of trade. Profit rates could be, in principle, influenced by the degree of openness of the economy. This could particularly be the case when the currency is overvalued because then profits are likely to be higher in ‘sheltered' sectors where trade is small than in industries whose trade is large. The Belgian carpet industry which was facing major problems during the second half of the 1970s managed to restructure the sector so remarkably that by the mid-1980s Belgium had emerged as the leading world exporter and the second biggest producer of carpets. The management correctly perceived that Belgium‘s comparative advantage lay mainly in tufted rather than woven carpets.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathew P.K.M. Tharakan & Jean Waelbroeck & D. Verstralen & A. Sendhaji, 2023. "Comparative advantage and competitiveness in a small, ‘open' economy," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/371811, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/371811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/371811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.