IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-331485.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the EU’s ‘social’ trade policy from an external europeanization perspective: The case of the generalised system of preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Eleni Xiarchogiannopoulou

Abstract

Trade policy is the most significant European Union (EU) policy area. Starting with the genesis of the European Communities in the 1950s, trade has been the stimulus of European integration. In 2013, the Single Market area has the biggest Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the world, while the EU is the leading global exporter of goods and one of the biggest importers (European Commission 2013c). The EU also uses its trade policy to pursue social goals such as the promotion of human rights, core labour standards and environmental and good governance principles. It does so through its wide network of Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs). A PTA is any trade agreement by which the EU offers trade preferences to countries outside its borders. The wide network of PTAs offers an international regulatory regime of trade that operates in parallel with the World Trade Organisation (WTO). This chapter focuses on a specific type of PTA, namely the EU’s Generalised System of Preferences (GSP). The particularity of the GSP compared to the rest of the EU’s PTAs is that the trade preferences it offers are non-reciprocal and that Social Conditionality (SC) governs the participation to the scheme. In other words, trade preferences are conditional to the adoption and implementation of a number of international human and labour rights, environmental and good governance conventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleni Xiarchogiannopoulou, 2016. "Assessing the EU’s ‘social’ trade policy from an external europeanization perspective: The case of the generalised system of preferences," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/331485, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/331485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/331485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.