IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-205630.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Centros and the cost of branching

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Becht
  • Luca Enriques
  • Veronika Korom

Abstract

Following the Centros, Überseering and Inspire Art decisions of the ECJ a thriving market for incorporations has developed in the European Union. Round-trip incorporation is competing with domestic incorporation. Entrepreneurs can set up a shell company in any EU jurisdiction and branch back to their home country to operate a business. The UK Limited is a popular choice in many countries because it is rapidly and cheaply available online with minimum formalities. We develop a taxonomy for measuring the cost of Limited round-trip incorporation. The cost of setting up a Limited is directly observable in the market while the cost of branching is not. We run field experiments to measure the cost of branching. Our analysis reveals that despite the ECJ rulings, branching remains costly or impractical in many cases. Incorporation agents play an essential role in overcoming the limitations to branching. Introduction, To incorporate a business at a lower cost than required by domestic company law, a Danish couple set up a UK shell company, Centros Limited, to operate a business exclusively in Denmark via a branch. Technically this was achieved by registering Centros Limited with Companies House in the United Kingdom and by applying for registration of a branch with the Danish companies register. After the Danish companies register refused registration of the branch, the case was brought to the ECJ, which declared the refusal of registration as being against the EC Treaty. Überseering and Inspire Art confirmed and strengthened the Centros ruling.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Becht & Luca Enriques & Veronika Korom, 2009. "Centros and the cost of branching," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/205630, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/205630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/205630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.