IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-168724.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Accuracy and limitations of continuous glucose monitoring using spectroscopy in critically ill patients

Author

Listed:
  • Roosmarijn R.T.M. van Hooijdonk
  • Tineke Winters
  • Johan Fischer
  • Edmée van Dongen-Lases
  • James J.S. Krinsley
  • Jean-Charles Preiser
  • Marcus M.J. Schultz

Abstract

Background: OptiScanner devices, continuous glucose monitoring devices that perform automated blood draws via a central venous catheter and create plasma through centrifugation, measure plasma glucose levels through mid-infrared spectroscopy at the bedside. The objective of this study was to determine accuracy and practicality of the devices in critically ill patients attempting glycemic control. Methods: The plasma glucose level was measured by the devices and in comparative plasma samples using Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) plasma analyzers. After adding several previously unrecognized interferences in the interference library, we reanalyzed the mid-infrared signals and compared the resulting plasma glucose level with the reference value. Results are presented in Clarke error grids, glucose prediction errors and Bland-Altman plots and expressed as correlation coefficients. Results: We analyzed 463 comparative samples from 71 patients (median 6 (4 to 9) samples per patient). After calibrating the system, a Clarke error grid showed 100% of the values in zones A or B. The glucose predictor error demonstrated that 86% of the glucose values

Suggested Citation

  • Roosmarijn R.T.M. van Hooijdonk & Tineke Winters & Johan Fischer & Edmée van Dongen-Lases & James J.S. Krinsley & Jean-Charles Preiser & Marcus M.J. Schultz, 2014. "Accuracy and limitations of continuous glucose monitoring using spectroscopy in critically ill patients," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/168724, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/168724
    Note: SCOPUS: ar.j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/168724/3/doi_152354.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/168724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.