IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ude/wpaper/0125.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Framework agreements in Uruguay: towards an optimal acquisition strategy in public procurement

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Ferreira

  • Carina Pizzinat

Abstract

This paper analyzes demand aggregation in public procurement using framework agreements. It describes alternative designs based on the experience of different countries, extends in the case of Uruguay, and identifies gains and challenges in a context of dynamic growth of ICTs in public procurement systems. A conceptual model of game theory is introduced to explain incentives to go on in the development of framework agreements, as well as some considerations to optimize its design. First results obtained for the Uruguayan case show relevant savings in the substitution of traditional procedures, not only in terms of financial costs -with reductions in average unit prices between 14% and 40%- but also referred to optimization of resources and transaction costs – with an estimated reduction of almost 70 days in the overall duration of the acquisition procedure, as well as in the number of hours and employees involved-. Finally, externalities on supply and possible lines of action are identified from the first lessons learned.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Ferreira & Carina Pizzinat, 2025. "Framework agreements in Uruguay: towards an optimal acquisition strategy in public procurement," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0125 Classification- H57,, Department of Economics - dECON.
  • Handle: RePEc:ude:wpaper:0125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/50296
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ude:wpaper:0125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrea Doneschi or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/derauuy.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.