IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Consumption Persistence and the Equity Premium Puzzle: A Resolution or Not? (Job Market Paper)

Listed author(s):
  • Jun Ma
Registered author(s):

    As first pointed out by Mehra and Prescott (1985), the excess return of equities over the risk-free rate, roughly 6%, is too high to be readily reconciled with a standard intertemporal model. Recently, Bansal and Yaron (2000, 2004) have demonstrated a resolution of the equity premium puzzle when high persistence in the consumption growth process is combined with the Generalized Expected Utility (GEU) specification of Epstein and Zin (1989, 1991). However, Nelson and Startz (2006) and Ma, Nelson, and Startz (2006) have shown that standard estimates of persistence are generally spurious in time series models that are weakly identified. This motivates the re-examination of the evidence for resolution of the equity premium puzzle in this paper. Using the valid Anderson-Rubin type test proposed by Ma and Nelson (2006) I show that weak identification may account for the apparent resolution and valid confidence regions and tests reject high persistence in consumption growth. Also, the possibility of integrated expectations is examined using the Median Unbiased Estimator of Stock and Watson (1998) and little supporting evidence is found. Evidently, the equity premium puzzle remains just that.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Washington, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number UWEC-2006-21-R.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Nov 2006
    Date of revision: Nov 2006
    Handle: RePEc:udb:wpaper:uwec-2006-21-r
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Box 353330, Seattle, WA 98193-3330

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udb:wpaper:uwec-2006-21-r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael Goldblatt)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.