IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/udb/wpaper/uwec-2004-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Secondary Benefits of Market-Based Environmental Regulation: The Case of Scrubbers

Author

Listed:
  • Allen Bellas
  • Ian Lange

Abstract

Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) introduced market-based incentives for controlling sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from coal burning power plants. Previous regulation under the 1977 CAAA had effectively required the use of scrubbers, but only by new power plants. The 1990 CAAA forced scrubbers to compete with other SO2 abatement options but also implemented emissions regulations for all power plants, thereby increasing the number of possible customers. While market-based incentives are widely believed to have lowered control costs, a secondary benefit would exist if this increased competition and potential demand reduced scrubbing costs by generating advancements in scrubber technology. To investigate this, we separate scrubbers by the regulatory regime in place when they were installed. A hedonic model is used to estimate the effect of changing regulatory regimes on the real capital (the purchase price) and operating costs of scrubbers. We find that while scrubbers installed under the 1990 CAAA are cheaper to purchase and operate than those installed under any other regulatory regime, these cost reductions seem to be a one-time drop rather than a continual decline.

Suggested Citation

  • Allen Bellas & Ian Lange, 2004. "The Secondary Benefits of Market-Based Environmental Regulation: The Case of Scrubbers," Working Papers UWEC-2004-11, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:udb:wpaper:uwec-2004-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://students.washington.edu/ilange1/adobes/scrubbing.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udb:wpaper:uwec-2004-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Goldblatt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuwaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.