IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uct/uconnp/1997-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Responding to Price Signals in Communal Agriculture: Shaker Hog Production, 1788-1850

Author

Listed:
  • John E. Murray

    (University of Toledo)

  • Metin M. Cosgel

    (University of Connecticut)

Abstract

Isolated Shaker communal farms stressed self-sufficiency as an ideal but carefully chose which goods to buy and sell in external markets and which to produce and consume themselves. We use records of hog slaughter weights to investigate the extent to which the Shakers incorporated market-based price information in determining production levels of a consumption good which they did not sell in external markets: pork. Granger causality tests indicate that Shaker pork production decisions were influenced as hypothesized, strongly by corn prices and weakly by pork prices. We infer that attention to opportunity costs of goods that they produced and consumed themselves was a likely factor aiding the longevity of Shaker communal societies.

Suggested Citation

  • John E. Murray & Metin M. Cosgel, 1997. "Responding to Price Signals in Communal Agriculture: Shaker Hog Production, 1788-1850," Working papers 1997-03, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:uct:uconnp:1997-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://media.economics.uconn.edu/working/1997-03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uct:uconnp:1997-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark McConnel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuctus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.