Food Subsides, Growth and Poverty A Critique on Neoliberal Institutional Structure
The relationship among payment style of subsidies, economic growth and poverty is a matter of challenge among economists and policy makers. Neoliberal Institutional Structure in framework of what is called "Washington Consensus" and "structural adjustment policies and economic stabilization" argues on economic advantages of removing food general subsidies so necessity of replacing a most liberalized food markets with regulated food security policy. This paper gives a historical background of this approach and criticizes it's policy recommendation and shows following it has led to a deep crisis in global food market in 2007 with sharply rising of poverty and dying of some people around the world due to lacking of access to food.
|Date of creation:||Oct 2009|
|Date of revision:||Oct 2009|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 4128 Sproul Hall, Riverside, CA 92521-0427|
Phone: (951) 827-3266
Fax: (951) 827-5685
Web page: http://economics.ucr.edu
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucr:wpaper:200912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kelvin Mac)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.