IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucn/oapubs/10197-1498.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Suicide in Dublin : II. the influence of some social and medical factors on coroners' verdicts

Author

Listed:
  • Brendan M. Walsh
  • Dermot Walsh
  • B. J. Whelan

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the factors which influence coroners in their decision to classify some deaths as suicides and others as accidental or 'open'. The most important influence on coroners' behaviour was seen to be the manner by which the person died. Those who died by cutting, hanging, drugs or gas were significantly more likely to receive a suicide verdict than those whose deaths were due to drowning, jumping, shooting or poisoning. If the deceased left any intimation of a suicidal intent, this increased the likelihood that a suicide verdict would be returned. Finally, persons aged under 40 were significantly more likely to be returned as suicides than older victims, especially those aged over 70. All of these results show that coroners operate by observing the law as it defines suicide, that is, by looking for evidence of intent of self-inflicted death. Our findings concerning the factors associated with the suicide verdict help to clarify the meaning of the official data on suicides in Ireland, and illuminate the reasons why, using clinical rather than legal criteria, a much higher rate is obtained.

Suggested Citation

  • Brendan M. Walsh & Dermot Walsh & B. J. Whelan, 1975. "Suicide in Dublin : II. the influence of some social and medical factors on coroners' verdicts," Open Access publications 10197/1498, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucn:oapubs:10197/1498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/1498
    File Function: Open Access version, 1975
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Suicide--Ireland; Coroners--Ireland;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucn:oapubs:10197/1498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nicolas Clifton (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/educdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.