IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucd/wpaper/202508.html

Subjective Assessments of the Quality of Social Investment Interventions: Taking a Bottom-Up Approach to Childcare Services in European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ausra Cizauskaite

    (School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

The topic of social investment (SI) in children through high-quality childcare provision remains high on the political and SI research agenda. It has generated research at both the individual and country level: childcare programme quality from a public funding angle (top-down) and individual experiences by parents/guardians as users of these services (bottom-up). To date, however, very little bottom-up research in the SI literature analyses how country-level variables influence users’ evaluations of childcare quality. This article’s main focus is to examine how user satisfaction with childcare quality at the individual level is related to objective childcare quality and contextual factors at the country-level. The study relies on a childcare satisfaction index (CSI) for EU (27) countries and the UK, constructed with data from Eurofound’s European Quality of Life Survey. The findings demonstrate that childcare users’ satisfaction with childcare quality is associated with trust in government, the intensity of childcare use, and SI reform strategies. The findings have important implications for SI research by showing the association between top-down factors and individual bottom-up satisfaction with childcare among formal childcare users. This research broadens existing childcare and SI literature by suggesting a multidimensional approach for analysing individual and country-level indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Ausra Cizauskaite, 2025. "Subjective Assessments of the Quality of Social Investment Interventions: Taking a Bottom-Up Approach to Childcare Services in European Countries," Working Papers 202508, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:202508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://geary.ucd.ie/workingpapers/workingpapers/gearywp202508.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naci Mocan, 2007. "Can consumers detect lemons? An empirical analysis of information asymmetry in the market for child care," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 20(4), pages 743-780, October.
    2. Sophia Schmitz, 2020. "The Impact of Publicly Funded Childcare on Parental Well-Being: Evidence from Cut-Off Rules," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(2), pages 171-196, April.
    3. Moss, Peter, 2012. "Parental leaves and early childhood education and care: From mapping the terrain to exploring the environment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 523-531.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henning Hermes & Philipp Lergetporer & Fabian Mierisch & Frauke Peter & Simon Wiederhold, 2023. "Discrimination on the Child Care Market: A Nationwide Field Experiment," Working Papers 225, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    2. Herbst, Chris M. & Tekin, Erdal, 2010. "Child care subsidies and child development," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 618-638, August.
    3. Robert Breunig & Xiaodong Gong & Anthony King, 2012. "Partnered Women's Labour Supply and Child‐Care Costs in Australia: Measurement Error and the Child‐Care Price," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(s1), pages 51-69, June.
    4. Chikako Yamauchi, 2010. "The availability of child care centers, perceived search costs and parental life satisfaction," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 231-253, June.
    5. Jonas Jessen & Christa Katharina Spieß & Sevrin Waights, 2022. "Centre‐Based Care and Parenting Activities," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(6), pages 1356-1379, December.
    6. Claire Crawford & Laura Outhwaite, 2023. "Why should we invest in Early Childhood Education and Care?," CEPEO Briefing Note Series 24, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Mar 2023.
    7. Gordon, James A. & Herbst, Chris M. & Tekin, Erdal, 2021. "Who's minding the kids? Experimental evidence on the demand for child care quality," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Brown, Jessica H. & Herbst, Chris M., 2023. "Minimum Wage, Worker Quality, and Consumer Well-Being: Evidence from the Child Care Market," IZA Discussion Papers 16257, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. Xiaodong Gong & Robert Breunig, 2010. "Child care availability, quality and affordability: are local problems related to maternal labour supply ?," Treasury Working Papers 2010-02, The Treasury, Australian Government, revised Apr 2010.
    10. Emre Akgunduz & Egbert Jongen & Paul P.M. Leseman & Janneke Plantenga, 2015. "Quasi-experimental evidence on the relation between child care subsidies and child care quality," CPB Discussion Paper 310, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    11. Zoch, Gundula & Bächmann, Ann-Christin & Vicari, Basha, 2020. "Care-Arrangements and Parental Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany," IAB-Discussion Paper 202035, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    12. Schüller, Simone & Steinberg, Hannah S., 2022. "Parents under stress: Evaluating emergency childcare policies during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Herbst, Chris M., 2022. "Child Care in the United States: Markets, Policy, and Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 15547, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Dang, Tung & Fisher, Hayley, 2025. "Daycare Accessibility and Maternal Labor Market Outcomes: Do Quality Ratings Matter?," IZA Discussion Papers 18300, IZA Network @ LISER.
    15. Datta Gupta, Nabanita & Jessen, Jonas & Spiess, C. Katharina, 2026. "Maternal Life Satisfaction and Child Development from Toddlerhood to Adolescence," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Online fi, pages 1-42.
    16. Abedullah & Shahzad Kouser, 2019. "Evaluating the Factors Determining Pesticide Residues in Vegetables: A Case Study of Lemons Market in Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2019:167, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    17. Valentina Rotondi, 2026. "Unequal Happiness Gains from Summer Breaks: Evidence from European Parents," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 1-29, January.
    18. Heikki Hiilamo & Marko Merikukka & Anita Haataja, 2018. "Long-Term Educational Outcomes of Child Care Arrangements in Finland," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, May.
    19. C. Katharina Spieß, 2010. "Was verspricht der Koalitionsvertrag der schwarz-gelben Bundesregierung im Bereich der Bildungs- und Familienpolitik?: Eine Bewertung ausgewählter Aspekte," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 79(1), pages 101-116.
    20. D. Vandelannoote & P. Vanleenhove & A. Decoster & J. Ghysels & G. Verbist, 2015. "Maternal employment: the impact of triple rationing in childcare," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 685-707, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:202508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Geary Tech The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Geary Tech to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/geucdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.