IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucd/wpaper/202504.html

Social Investment in Childcare: Exploring the Role of Education, Income and Public Expenditure on User Satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Ausra Cizauskaite

    (School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Ireland)

  • Karen M. Anderson

    (School of Politics and International Relations, University College Dublin, Ireland)

  • Micheál L. Collins

    (School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

Social investment in children through the provision of high-quality childcare is high on political and academic agendas across the European Union. There are two distinctive themes in the SI and childcare literature: childcare program quality at the country level examining ‘Matthew Effects’ and the individual experiences of service users, namely, individuals with small children. However, studies have been mainly focused on childcare accessibility and use, which is one of the major disadvantages in SI and childcare literature. Yet, little is known about what people think about childcare quality, as this issue is under-researched in the literature and focuses on relatively broad socio-economic characteristics. How do ‘Matthew Effects’ in childcare drive satisfaction with childcare quality among formal childcare users? Current research takes a top-down approach by looking at public investments in childcare and finds that higher investments tend to flow to better-off people, leading to higher participation rates in formal childcare services (Cantillon 2011; Pavolini and Van Lancker, 2018; Van Lancker and Ghysels, 2012). However, existing literature does not ask how satisfied better-off people, who benefit more from childcare programmes, are with the quality of childcare services. Drawing on analysis of data from Eurofound’s European Quality of Life Survey 2016, this study contributes to these debates by investigating individual satisfaction with childcare services’ quality using a bottom-up approach for the EU (27) and the UK. The research examines the extent to which educational background and income - two variables closely associated with socio-economic status - are associated with individual satisfaction with childcare quality. The analysis of formal childcare users suggests that existing Matthew Effects in childcare use do not necessarily mean more satisfaction with childcare quality. We also find that higher educational background is inversely related to user satisfaction with childcare. This suggests that more-educated individuals have higher expectations about quality, and they also adapt these expectations in response to their experience with childcare services over time. We also explore a variable central to the approach - whether higher public expenditures on childcare lead to higher individual satisfaction with childcare quality. The findings show that childcare expenditure matters, but what matters more is the public spending context: individuals in low-and high-spending countries have higher levels of satisfaction, compared to those in medium-expenditure countries. The findings are important to the existing Social Investment and childcare literature examining Matthew Effects and suggest that childcare quality should be analysed more broadly, taking both a top-down and bottom-up approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Ausra Cizauskaite & Karen M. Anderson & Micheál L. Collins, 2025. "Social Investment in Childcare: Exploring the Role of Education, Income and Public Expenditure on User Satisfaction," Working Papers 202504, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:202504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://geary.ucd.ie/workingpapers/workingpapers/gearywp202504.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gambaro, Ludovica & Stewart, Kitty & Waldfogel, Jane, 2015. "A question of quality: do children from disadvantaged backgrounds receive lower quality early childhood education and care?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60010, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Sophia Schmitz, 2020. "The Impact of Publicly Funded Childcare on Parental Well-Being: Evidence from Cut-Off Rules," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(2), pages 171-196, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ausra Cizauskaite & Micheál L. Collins & Karen M. Anderson, 2026. "Social Investment in Childcare: Exploring Women’s Subjective Assessments of Work-Care Balance Difficulties," Working Papers 202601, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jo Blanden & Emilia Del Bono & Kirstine Hansen & Birgitta Rabe, 2022. "Quantity and quality of childcare and children’s educational outcomes," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 785-828, April.
    2. Jonas Jessen & Christa Katharina Spieß & Sevrin Waights, 2022. "Centre‐Based Care and Parenting Activities," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(6), pages 1356-1379, December.
    3. Claire Crawford & Laura Outhwaite, 2023. "Why should we invest in Early Childhood Education and Care?," CEPEO Briefing Note Series 24, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Mar 2023.
    4. van Vugt, Lynn & Nieuwenhuis, Rense & Levels, Mark, 2020. "Escaping the motherhood trap: Parental leave and childcare help young mothers to avoid NEET risks," ROA Research Memorandum 011, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    5. Zoch, Gundula & Bächmann, Ann-Christin & Vicari, Basha, 2020. "Care-Arrangements and Parental Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany," IAB-Discussion Paper 202035, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    6. Schüller, Simone & Steinberg, Hannah S., 2022. "Parents under stress: Evaluating emergency childcare policies during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Ayooluwa Oke & Judith E. Butler & Cian O’Neill, 2021. "“Who Would Bother Getting a Degree When You Would Be on the Exact Same Pay and Conditions . . .?†Professionalism and the Problem With Qualifications in Early Childhood Education and Care: An Irish Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    8. Campbell, Tammy & Gambaro, Ludovica & Stewart, Kitty, 2019. "Inequalities in the experience of early education in England: access, peer groups and transitions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103460, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Datta Gupta, Nabanita & Jessen, Jonas & Spiess, C. Katharina, 2026. "Maternal Life Satisfaction and Child Development from Toddlerhood to Adolescence," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Online fi, pages 1-42.
    10. Valentina Rotondi, 2026. "Unequal Happiness Gains from Summer Breaks: Evidence from European Parents," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Mathias Huebener & Sevrin Waights & C. Katharina Spiess & Nico A. Siegel & Gert G. Wagner, 2021. "Parental well-being in times of Covid-19 in Germany," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 91-122, March.
    12. Dahl, Gordon & Loken, Katrine V., 2024. "Families, public policies, and the labor market," Handbook of Labor Economics,, Elsevier.
    13. Heisig, Jan P. & Gracia, Pablo & Morton, Thomas & Power, Séamus A. & Schaeffer, Merlin & Udsen, Rebecca, 2025. "Schools, childcare infrastructures, and mothers’ time use and psychological well-being. Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-15.
    14. Gordon Dahl & Katrine Loken, 2024. "Families, Public Policies, and the Labor Market," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 2423, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    15. Campbell, Tammy & Gambaro, Ludovica & Stewart, Kitty, 2018. "‘Universal’ early education: Who benefits? Patterns in take-up of the entitlement to free early education among three-year-olds in England," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 44(3), pages 515-538.
    16. Tammy Campbell & Ludovica Gambaro & Kitty Stewart, 2019. "Inequalities in the experience of early education in England: Access, peer groups and transitions," CASE Papers /214, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    17. Lina Tobler & Bernhard Christoph & Lukas Fervers & Marita Jacob, 2025. "When the Burden Lifts: The Effect of School and Day Care Reopenings on Parents’ Life Satisfaction," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-34, January.
    18. Jo Blanden & Kirstine Hansen & Sandra McNally, 2017. "Quality in early years settings and children’s school achievement," CEP Discussion Papers dp1468, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    19. Ausra Cizauskaite, 2025. "Subjective Assessments of the Quality of Social Investment Interventions: Taking a Bottom-Up Approach to Childcare Services in European Countries," Working Papers 202508, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    20. Ife Jesuseun Adeleke & Ololade Elizabeth Adewusi & Nancy Mohd Al Hamad & Udochukwu Chidiebere Nwankwo & Godson Chinenye Nwokocha, 2024. "A Comparative Review Of Early Childhood Education Policies In Nigeria And The Uk," Education, Sustainability & Society (ESS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 01-11, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:202504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Geary Tech The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Geary Tech to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/geucdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.