IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Perceptions of the Dioxin Crisis in Irish Pork


  • Jean Kennedy

    (University College Dublin)

  • Liam Delaney

    (University College Dublin)

  • Aileen McGloin

    (University College Dublin)

  • Patrick G. Wall

    (University College Dublin)


In early December 2008, a global recall of Irish pork was initiated as a result of a subset of the national pork output being contaminated with dioxin. In this study, members of a panel from an internet-based longitudinal monitor of public opinion on food and health, was used to assess public perceptions about the dioxin incident in late December. A larger proportion of respondents reported that that there was a 'very high' health risk from pork (8.6 %) than any other food of animal origin. The risk posed to human health from dioxins was considered to be relatively high compared to a broad range of potential food and non-food risks. The majority of respondents (70.5 %) accepted that the way in which the authorities managed the crisis was 'adequate' or 'very efficient'. These findings should be considered in light of the following facts: the European Food Safety Authority and the Irish authorities announced that there was no risk to human health from the dioxins in pork, there was extensive media attention about the dioxin incident, and the Irish Government had to introduce a 200 million euro compensation package for the Irish pork industry which was funded by the Irish taxpayer.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Kennedy & Liam Delaney & Aileen McGloin & Patrick G. Wall, 2009. "Public Perceptions of the Dioxin Crisis in Irish Pork," Working Papers 200919, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:200919

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 2009
    Download Restriction: no


    Blog mentions

    As found by, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. public perception of irish dioxin scare
      by Liam Delaney in Geary Behaviour Centre on 2009-06-19 22:53:00

    More about this item


    food risk; dioxins; consumer risk perception;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucd:wpaper:200919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Geary Tech). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.