IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucb/calbwp/94-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tobacco Taxes and the Anti-Smoking Media Campaign: The California Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Teh-wei Hu, Hai- yen Sung and Theodore E. Keeler.

Abstract

In 1988, California voters enacted Proposition 99, increasing the tax on cigarettes by 25 cents per pack effective January 1989. Proposition 99 also earmarked 20% of the revenue raised by this new tax for an anti-smoking media campaign and other educational programs to reduce tobacco use. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relative effects of taxation versus the anti-smoking media campaign on cigarette sales. Quarterly sales data reported by the California State Board of Equalization between 1980 and 1992, adjusted for seasonal variations and time trends, show that sales of cigarettes were reduced by 1333 million packs as a result of the additional 25-cent tax, while the anti-smoking media campaign reduced cigarette sales by 232 million packs during the same period, July 1990- December 1992. The combined effects of taxes and the anti-smoking media campaign during the 4-year post Proposition 99 period resulted in 1.565 billion fewer packs of cigarettes sold in California. The magnitude of those effects is influenced by the magnitude of taxes compared with the amount of the anti- smoking media campaign budget.

Suggested Citation

  • Teh-wei Hu, Hai- yen Sung and Theodore E. Keeler., 1994. "Tobacco Taxes and the Anti-Smoking Media Campaign: The California Experience," Economics Working Papers 94-225, University of California at Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucb:calbwp:94-225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/iber/wps/econ/E94-225.doc
    File Function: main text, MS Word format
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucb:calbwp:94-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debrkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.