IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tse/wpaper/132341.html

When Economists Disagree : Beliefs, Values, and Policy endorsements

Author

Listed:
  • Gollier, Christian
  • Van der Straeten, Karine
  • Zheng, Jiakun

Abstract

Economists frequently take opposing positions in public policy debates. To investigate the respective roles of beliefs about how the economy works and normative values in these disagreements, we survey academic economists who publicly took opposing positions on the economic program of the Nouveau Front Populaire, a broad left-wing electoral alliance, during the 2024 French legislative campaign. We elicit their beliefs about inequality and the cost of redistribution, and measure their inequality aversion through a leaky-bucket task. We find substantial differences between endorsers and non-endorsers in both beliefs and distributive preferences. Moreover, beliefs and inequality aversion are strongly correlated, substantially more so than in a representative sample of the French population. Both dimensions help account for economists’ policy positions. Our findings suggest that economists’ policy disagreements involve both empirical assessments and normative values, and that these two dimensions are themselves closely intertwined.

Suggested Citation

  • Gollier, Christian & Van der Straeten, Karine & Zheng, Jiakun, 2026. "When Economists Disagree : Beliefs, Values, and Policy endorsements," TSE Working Papers 26-1799, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
  • Handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:132341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/document/wp_tse_1799.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:132341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsetofr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.