IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tre/wpaper/13.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ranking Higher Education to boost competition: toward entrepreneurial universities or new form of centralism? The case of Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Modugno, Guido
  • Tivan, Moreno
  • Ventin, Giulia

Abstract

The practice of ranking public entities is not widespread in Italy. Although assessments of the quality of public services are made more and more often and the demand for public accountability is growing, neither local governments nor hospitals and local health agencies are ranked in official lists. In this context, Universities are an exception: the paper first discusses what are the causes of this different treatment. The metrics used to rank Universities and the effects of the methods are then analysed. This discussion allows to highlight how the purpose and the destination of the rank influence the whole process. Some references to the international practice are also given. One more aspect which is considered concerns the effects of rankings on the higher education institutions (HEIs). The variables used to rank institution are de facto assuming the role of key performance indicators. The strategy of each institution is therefore strongly influenced by centrally stated factors: this raises a question on the feasibility for Universities to develop their own plans and competitive strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Modugno, Guido & Tivan, Moreno & Ventin, Giulia, 2013. "Ranking Higher Education to boost competition: toward entrepreneurial universities or new form of centralism? The case of Italy," Working Papers DEAMS 13, DEAMS - Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Aziendali, Matematiche e Statistiche "Bruno de Finetti".
  • Handle: RePEc:tre:wpaper:13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.openstarts.units.it/dspace/handle/10077/9472
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tre:wpaper:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianni Perini (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detriit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.