IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

On The Motivation and Power of Stochastic Dominance Techniques for Multiple Wellbeing Comparisons

Listed author(s):
  • Gordon Anderson
  • Thierry Post
Registered author(s):

    Using the ethical concept of the Veil of Ignorance, social planners would consider well-being problems as decision making under risk, which provides a rationale for using 'Convex Stochastic Dominance' to compare well-being distributions. This approach yields more discriminating power than standard pairwise Stochastic Dominance comparisons in the face of a multitude of distributions from various time sub-periods and/or sub-populations. A Linear Programming test for 'Stochastic Dominance optimality' can be derived from the first principles of utility theory. This test casts new light on the modern history of the US income distribution.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by University of Toronto, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number tecipa-570.

    as
    in new window

    Length: Unknown pages
    Date of creation: 23 Nov 2016
    Handle: RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-570
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario

    Phone: (416) 978-5283

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RePEc Maintainer)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.