Should Zombie Be in the Grave? : A Simulation-Based Policy Comparison between Two Types of Economies
The aim of this paper is to examine the argument that low productive firms should be closed to make the macroeconomic performance better. It is said that the existence of zombie firms is one of the reason for the stagnation of Japanese economy. The process of creative destruction where the new entries which have higher productivity is not in the right way because of the existence of zombie, that is, "zombie firms prevent more productive companies from gaining market share, strangling a potentially important source of productivity gains for the overall economy (Ahearne and Shinada (2005), p364)." But, if the bankruptcy of one firm affects on the other firms, this argument does not hold because there are firms which are embroiled into the bankruptcy chain. This firm's productivity is not so low that they go into bankruptcy if the whole economic performance is good. Ih this paper, the validity of zombie theory is examined by way of computer simulation with the network economy framework.
|Date of creation:||Aug 2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.econ.tohoku.ac.jp/econ/english/index.html
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:toh:tergaa:270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tohoku University Library)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.