IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/toh/dssraa/153.html

Two Answers, One Belief What Household Inflation Expectations Measure

Author

Listed:
  • Wali Ullah

Abstract

The New York Fed Survey of Consumer Expectations asks households for both a point forecast of inflation and a probability distribution over the same horizon. The two responses differ by 3.46 percentage points on average. The analysis shows that much of this gap reflects the artifact of survey design rather than differences in beliefs. The reported standard deviation is mechanically generated by which bins a household ticks for about 42% of respondent-months, and restricting the sample to densities inside the interior bins cuts the average divergence by 89%. What remains is a reporting error rather than a preference, which is two-sided, and its persistence decays to half in about three months. Between 65 and 67 percent of the crosssectional dispersion in reported point forecasts is measurement error rather than disagreement, and the implied degree of information rigidity is 0.54 using the density means against 0.38 using the point forecasts.

Suggested Citation

  • Wali Ullah, 2026. "Two Answers, One Belief What Household Inflation Expectations Measure," DSSR Discussion Papers 153, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
  • Handle: RePEc:toh:dssraa:153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10097/0002008532
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:toh:dssraa:153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tohoku University Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetohjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.