"Reply to Shigekatu Yamaguchi's "Michiaki Obata's Criticism of Uno's Theory"" (in Japanese)
Against my article "Criticsim of Theory of Pure Capitalism" in 2008, Prof. Shigekatu Yamaguchi published the article entitled "Michiaki Obata's Criticism of Uno's Theorety" in 2010 where he reproach me for the excessive "misunderstanding" and "incorrect interpretation" to the "Uno's Theory". This paper is the reply to this. Main points in dispute comes out about (1) difference between "ruin" theory and "collapse" theory of capitalism, (2) relation between the stage theory of capitalist development and "transition process" from capitalism, (3) contrast between "typicality" and "similarity" in the stage theory, and (4) the origin of capitalism. My short remarks on "interpretation" is given to the last.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||May 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033|
Web page: http://www.cirje.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/index.html
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tky:jseres:2012cj241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CIRJE administrative office)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.