IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

"Relevance of Earnings, Losses and Book Value of Equity: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms in Japan-Part II Industry-Period Analysis -" (in Japanese)

Listed author(s):
  • Takashi Obinata

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo)

Registered author(s):

    This paper investigates, by industry and by period, the value relevance of earnings of manufacturing firms in Japan. The richness of its relevance is determined by the closeness of relation between expected permanent earnings of a firm and reported earnings, i.e. the persistence of earnings. The persistence of earnings is also affected by such a competitive condition as the endurance of firm fs competitive advantage in the industry. Therefore, the industry effect in an economy (country or region), which is characterized by the composition of industry and the environments in each industry, may affect the value relevance of earnings in that economy. In addition, the industry effect is not necessarily fixed over a long time. In order to controlling the changeable nature of industry effect, this research partitions sample years into three periods. In this way, this paper directly examines the changes in the relevance of earnings by period in each industry. For investigating the factor affecting the relevance of earnings and book value of equity, we apply some meta-analysis to the estimated results by OLS. Major evidence and results provided by this research are as follows. First, whether earnings is value-relevant differs much across industries and among periods. This shows the existence of industry effect. Second, when the factor indigenous to losses (negative earnings) is separated by introducing a dummy variable of loss firms, earnings is consistently value-relevant during all sample periods. It is not observed that the bubble economy or the following recession eliminates the relevance of earnings. Third, the effect by the factor indigenous to losses differs across industries and among periods. The larger the ratio of loss firms in sample is, the larger that effect becomes. This implies that investors don ft evaluate loss of a firm so strictly when the industry that it belongs to is under depression. Fourth, we cannot find the fact that the relevance of book value of equity has been recently increasing. Contrarily, the number of industry, where the book value of equity is value-relevant, has been decreasing. Fifth, we find the weak evidence that information on book value of equity complements earnings information by controlling the factor contained in losses.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo in its series CIRJE J-Series with number CIRJE-J-87.

    in new window

    Length: 88 pages
    Date of creation: Dec 2002
    Handle: RePEc:tky:jseres:2002cj87
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033

    Phone: +81-3-5841-5644
    Fax: +81-3-5841-8294
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tky:jseres:2002cj87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CIRJE administrative office)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.