IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20260081.html

Representation over Rents: Sorting in a Market for Lemons

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoming Cai

    (Peking University HSBC Business School)

  • Pieter Gautier

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

Search frictions normally raise the bar for sorting: both random and directed search require complementarities strictly stronger than the supermodularity that suffices in Becker's (1973) frictionless model. We introduce private information into this setting: firms post wages without observing worker productivity, while better workers have better outside options, creating a market for lemons (Akerlof 1970). We show that this information friction pushes sorting the other way: attracting high-productivity workers without attracting low-productivity ones requires a higher wage paired with a lower job-finding probability, so vacancies fill faster. This strict ranking of vacancy filling rates sorts the market positively whenever output is complementary in worker and firm quality. Becker's condition therefore suffices once more, and private information makes positive sorting easier to sustain than complete information does.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoming Cai & Pieter Gautier, 2026. "Representation over Rents: Sorting in a Market for Lemons," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 26-081/VI, Tinbergen Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/26081.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.