IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Partnership And Subsidiarity: An Irish Case Study Of Rural Development

Listed author(s):
  • Áine Macken Walsh


    (Rural Economy and Development Programme, Teagasc, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland)

Registered author(s):

    The governance and rural development model is considered to be a conducive policy approach for a EU rural economy that contemporarily seeks to focus less on intensive productivist agriculture and more on innovation and diversification. The model claims to encourage more representative and effective rural development, on the basis that different local stakeholders are involved as decision-makers in the development process, and that the emergent development outcome is more local and integrated as a result. The operation of governance and rural development models that are designed both to achieve popular participation and to represent a diverse range of interests for the purposes of developing the rural economy is hinged on a number of assumptions, however, among them the broad generalisation that local rural people are “competent actors in the development process” (LEADER European Observatory, 1997). With growing emphasis internationally on the need for innovation and diversification in rural income-generating activity (Future of Rural Society, CEC (1988); Lisbon Strategy, CEC (2007)), it is timely to explore the sociological factors that have governed the extent to which, and how, rural inhabitants (as well as different social groups) have been engaging with new paradigms for rural development thus far. With reference to the Irish case, this paper explores the possibility that the partnership model, though representing an effort to ‘hand over’ the development process to local people, can also marginalise local people through its fostering of a particular rural development ‘product’. Entrepreneurs who engage in indigenising the local economy (tourism; organic and artisan producers) are the new pioneers, with traditional agricultural producers often in the position of having to adapt to new development rules. In Ireland it is evident that a high number of officially categorised non-viable farming enterprises are persisting and conventional farmers are showing resistance to involvement in contemporary rural development programmes. This paper explores the key features of the contemporary rural development agenda and presents case-study analysis of the factors that conventional farmers identify as featuring prominently in their decisions not to engage.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 2008
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc in its series Working Papers with number 0815.

    in new window

    Length: 27 pages
    Date of creation: 2008
    Handle: RePEc:tea:wpaper:0815
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Athenry, Co Galway

    Phone: +353 91 845845
    Fax: +353 91 845847
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tea:wpaper:0815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John Lennon)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.