IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tbs/wpaper/2026-04.html

Prewar-Postwar Output Volatility and Shock-Persistence Debate: A Closer Look and New Results

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Levy

    (Department of Economics Emory University, Bar-Illan University, ICEA, ISET at TSU, and RCEA)

  • Hashem Dezhbakhsh

    (Department of Economics Emory University,)

Abstract

It is well established that the U.S. prewar output was more volatile and less shock persistent than the postwar output. This is often attributed to the data interpolation employed to construct the prewar series. Our analytical results, however, indicate that commonly used linear interpolation has the opposite effect on shock persistence and volatility of a series —it increases shock persistence and reduces volatility. The surprising implication of this finding is that the actual differences between the volatility and shock persistence of the prewar and postwar output series are likely greater than the existing literature recognizes, and interpolation has dampened rather than magnified this difference. Consequently, the view that postwar output was more stable than prewar output because of the effectiveness of the postwar stabilization policies and institutional changes has considerable merit. Our results hold for parsimonious stationary and nonstationary time series commonly used to model.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Levy & Hashem Dezhbakhsh, 2026. "Prewar-Postwar Output Volatility and Shock-Persistence Debate: A Closer Look and New Results," Working Papers 04-26, International School of Economics at TSU, Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia.
  • Handle: RePEc:tbs:wpaper:2026-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iset.ge/files/wp_04-26_Prewar-Postwar_Output_Volatility_and_Shock-%20Persistence_Debate.pdfJELCodes:E32,E01,N10,C02,C18,C22,C82
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tbs:wpaper:2026-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/istsuge.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.