IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sza/wpaper/wpapers392.html

Between Public Duty and Private Profit: Government Officials and Real Estate Investments in the Cape Colony, 1897–1902

Author

Listed:
  • Munashe Chideya

    (Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University)

  • Johan Fourie

    (Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University)

Abstract

Between 1897 and 1902, despite formal prohibitions, Cape Colony civil servants and politicians invested in private real estate joint-stock companies. Using Cape company records, civil service registers, newspapers and government correspondence, this article reconstructs these investments and traces how parliamentary procedures, especially private bills for railways, harbour works and water rights, were leveraged to inflate land values for personal gain. Across eight companies, twenty-two politicians and seven civil servants invested 57,907 pounds, representing 23.17 per cent of the total paid-up capital. While civil servants, who invested 1,770 pounds of the total, were largely passive investors, politicians, who invested 56,137 pounds, dominated capital subscriptions and occupied directorates, shaping legislation and land-use policy. Case studies of the Milnerton Estates and Saldanha Bay companies reveal that such conflicts of interest were publicly debated but poorly contained. This article argues that real estate speculation illustrates how enterprise and state power co-produced colonial urban space in the Cape.

Suggested Citation

  • Munashe Chideya & Johan Fourie, 2026. "Between Public Duty and Private Profit: Government Officials and Real Estate Investments in the Cape Colony, 1897–1902," Working Papers 02/2026, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sza:wpaper:wpapers392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ekon.sun.ac.za/wpapers/2026/wp022026/wp022026.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • N47 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - Africa; Oceania
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • N97 - Economic History - - Regional and Urban History - - - Africa; Oceania

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sza:wpaper:wpapers392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melt van Schoor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desunza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.