IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sur/seedps/87.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

UK Energy Policy: Findings from Two Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Peter J G Pearson

    (Centre for Environmental Technology, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine.)

  • Roger Fouqet

    (Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), Department of Economics, University of Surrey)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide information on the views of a set of ‘experts’ about UK energy policy, and to contribute to the debate about energy policy in the UK and elsewhere. The paper summarises the results of two surveys, carried out in November 1992 and December 1994, of the opinions of UK energy professionals. They were asked about the appropriateness and effectiveness of UK energy policy, about what objectives energy policy should seek to achieve and about how they should be achieved. Most respondents said that there should be a long-term energy policy, at the level of both the UK and Europe. Such a policy should create a regulatory framework that complements market forces in order to improve the efficiency of energy use and environmental quality, to enhance security of supplies and to reduce the costs of energy supplies. Around two-thirds, however, said that existing UK energy policies were inappropriate and ineffective. There were serious doubts about the effectiveness of the regulation of gas and electricity, particularly the latter. Opinions tended to be somewhat more favourable in 1994 than in 1992. Just under half the respondents wanted nuclear power to occupy a special place in policy, while two-fifths wanted a special place for electricity from renewable sources. While the experts’ desired energy policy objectives were broadly similar to those listed by the Government in 1994, the rankings were in many cases different. The energy professionals were not fully convinced that the objectives had been satisfactorily achieved. The paper also draws some wider lessons from the UK’s recent policy experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter J G Pearson & Roger Fouqet, 1996. "UK Energy Policy: Findings from Two Surveys," Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), School of Economics Discussion Papers (SEEDS) 87, Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), School of Economics, University of Surrey.
  • Handle: RePEc:sur:seedps:87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.som.surrey.ac.uk/seeds/SEEDS87.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sur:seedps:87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mona Chitnis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eesuruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.