IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Vertical integration and discrimination in the German railway sector : results of a questionnaire survey

Listed author(s):
  • Martin Zauner


    (Institute of Economics and Law, Department of Microeconomics and Spatial Economics, University of Stuttgart)

Registered author(s):

    In this paper we draw on the results from a survey of train operating companies to demonstrate potential and actual discriminative behaviour of a vertically integrated railway network supplier in Germany against new entrants on the downstream-market. The results point out that discrimination is a concern, especially relating to slot allocation, emergency services and access to other essential facilities. Though, it must be mentioned that the results are rather based on subjective opinions than on objective values. Nevertheless, the results raise the question if the existing regulatory system is adequate to control possible discriminative behaviour.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Stuttgart, Institute of Economics and Law in its series Discussion paper series from the Institute of Economics and Law, University of Stuttgart with number 2004/1.

    in new window

    Length: 26 pages
    Date of creation: 06 Aug 2004
    Handle: RePEc:stt:dpaper:20041
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Keplerstrasse 17, 70174 Stuttgart

    Phone: (0711) 121-3542
    Fax: (0711) 121-3555
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:stt:dpaper:20041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Institute of Economics and Law, University of Stuttgart)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.