IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

On dispersion preserving estimation of the mean of a binary variable from small areas

Listed author(s):
Registered author(s):

    Over-shrinkage is a common problem in small area (or domain) estimation. It happens when the estimated small-area parameters have less between-area variation than their true values. To deal with this problem, Louis (1984), Ghosh (1992) and Spjøtvoll and Thomsen (1987) have proposed various constrained empirical and hierarchical Bayes methods. In this paper we study two non-Bayesian methods based on, respectively, the synthetic estimator and a variance-component model. We show first that the synthetic estimator entails loss of dispersion in general, from which it follows that the coverage level of the confidence intervals could be far below the nominal level of confidence, when these are derived from the sampling error alone. A bivariate variance-component model at the area-level, as well as its simplification, can greatly improve the efficiency of the confidence intervals. However, super-population approaches as such are unable to capture the distribution of the true area-parameters. We develop a finite-population approach based on an empirical finite-population distribution function of the area-parameters, which provides the necessary adjustment. The various methods will be illustrated using the data of the Census 1990. Finally, we notice that several European countries will base the upcoming Census on their administrative register systems, instead of collecting the information in the field. Improved small area estimation methods may prove to be valuable for assessing the quality of such Register Counting.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Statistics Norway, Research Department in its series Discussion Papers with number 285.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Aug 2000
    Handle: RePEc:ssb:dispap:285
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    P.O.Box 8131 Dep, N-0033 Oslo, Norway

    Phone: (+47) 21 09 00 00
    Fax: +47 - 62 88 55 95
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssb:dispap:285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (L Maasø)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.