IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sru/ssewps/122.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Combinatorial Model of Organizational Innovation: The Case of Pilkington Plc

Author

Abstract

Based on an in-depth case study of Pilkington Plc, this study illustrates that received perspectives in organization theory and theory of the firm fall short of explaining organizational evolution. The framework of organizational evolution developed in this paper is combinatorial in two ways. First, it shows how factors drawn from different perspectives can be combined in understanding organizational evolution. Second, it shows the explanatory and prescriptive potential of a combinatorial approach to resources and organizational configurations. This approach helps distinguish those features of organizational history that are ineffective and those that are instead effective for the firm survival. In Pilkington, the successful changes of firm boundaries have been predominantly linked to the combination of complementary resources rather than the resolving of transactional problems or realizing economies of scope through related diversification. The changes of internal structure have been successful due to a combination of waves of decentralization and centralization with a stable, robust coordination by communities at the level of research activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Grandori & Andrea Prencipe, 2004. "A Combinatorial Model of Organizational Innovation: The Case of Pilkington Plc," SPRU Working Paper Series 122, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
  • Handle: RePEc:sru:ssewps:122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/sewp122.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizational structure and evolution; Pilkington plc; combinatorial approach; organization theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sru:ssewps:122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: University of Sussex Business School Communications Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.