IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/spo/wpmain/infohdl2441-5063.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Appendix 2 : Taxation in Europe : Towards more competition or more co-ordination ?

Author

Listed:
  • Henri Sterdyniak

    (Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques)

Abstract

Taxation is high in EU countries. Tax-to-GDP ratios stand at around 40% compared with 25% in Japan and the US. This high level of taxation provides the funding of the European social model characterised by a high level of public expenditure and transfers. Apart from governing powers (armed forces, police, justice), the State provides free services to households (education, health); finances public infrastructures, research, culture; pays significant social transfers (family policy, minimum income) and social insurance (pensions, unemployment). Ageing populations imply higher pensions and health spending; technical progress leads to higher education and research spending; rising social exclusion implies higher assistance benefits. People ask for more public infrastructure and higher security spending. Military spending as well as aid to developing countries seem to be required if countries wish to play a major role internationally. All these elements make the rising trend in public spending difficult to resist. Besides, European countries think that public spending should be on a contributory basis. It makes sense to have people on highest incomes or wealth pay more for collective spending, as they benefit most from the way the social system is organised. Taxes must reduce income inequalities. It is hence crucial for European countries to remain entitled to collect tax revenues, according to democratically agreed rules. Section 2 discusses how the European social model is at risk in a global world; it discusses several strategies for European taxation: competition, unification, coordination. Section 3 provides a descriptive analysis of tax structures and trends in Europe. Section 4 deals with income tax coordination. Section 5 addresses social contributions coordination. Section 6 deals with corporate taxation. Section 7 concludes with a strategy for tax co-ordination.

Suggested Citation

  • Henri Sterdyniak, 2005. "Appendix 2 : Taxation in Europe : Towards more competition or more co-ordination ?," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/5063, Sciences Po.
  • Handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/5063/resources/appendix2-sterdyniak.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabelle Joumard, 2003. "Tax systems in European Union countries," OECD Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2002(1), pages 91-151.
    2. Henri Sterdyniak & Pierre Villa & Département analyse et prévision de l'OFCE, 1998. "Pour une réforme du financement de la Sécurité sociale," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 67(1), pages 155-205.
    3. Réjane Hugounenq, 2003. "L'imposition des revenus du capital et des entreprises en Europe. Les logiques à l'œuvre," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 86(3), pages 43-81.
    4. Réjane Hugounenq & Jacques Le Cacheux & Thierry Madiès, 1999. "Diversité des fiscalités européennes et risques de concurrence fiscale," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 70(1), pages 63-109.
    5. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2001. "Le double dividende. Les approches théoriques," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 16(2), pages 119-147.
    6. Jacques H.Drèze & Edmond Malinvaud & Paul De Grauwe & Louis Gevers & Alexander Italianer & Olivier Lefebvre & Maurice Marchand & Henri Sneessens & Alfred Steinherr & Paul Champsaur & Jean-Michel Charp, 1994. "Croissance et emploi : l'ambition d'une initiative européenne," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 49(1), pages 247-288.
    7. Gaël Dupont & Henri Sterdyniak & Jacques Le Cacheux & Vincent Touzé, 2000. "La réforme fiscale en France : bilan et perspectives," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 75(1), pages 183-242.
    8. Odile Chagny & Gaël Dupont & Henri Sterdyniak & Paola Veroni, 2001. "Les réformes des systèmes de retraite en Europe," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 78(3), pages 97-208.
    9. CEPII & OFCE & Marie-Hélène Blonde & Gérard Cornilleau & Pascal Helwaser & Jacques Le Cacheux & Jean Le Dem & Henri Sterdyniak & Bill Robinson & Stephen Smith, 1990. "Vers une fiscalité européenne ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 31(1), pages 121-189.
    10. Réjane Hugounenq & Jacques Le Cacheux & Thierry Madiès, 1999. "Risques de concurrence fiscale en Europe," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/2142, Sciences Po.
    11. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64, pages 416-416.
    12. European Commission, 2001. "Annex to Company Taxation in the Internal Market," Taxation Studies 0006, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    13. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/2092 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. European Commission, 2001. "Company Taxation in the Internal Market," Taxation Studies 0005, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    15. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/2543 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/2094 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5281 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jérôme Creel & Francesco Saraceno, 2008. "Automatic Stabilisation, Discretionary Policy and the Stability Pact," Sciences Po publications 2008-15, Sciences Po.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Spire @ Sciences Po Library). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ecspofr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.