IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/spa/wpaper/2026wpecon13.html

Play to Your Strengths: Incumbency Effect and Issue Emphasis in Brazilian Local Elections

Author

Listed:
  • Leila Pereira

Abstract

Incumbents’ reputations acquired during their time in office influence voters’ choices. Some studies suggest that, when designing their campaign messages, incumbents may benefit from playing to their strengths and emphasizing fewer issues than challengers. In this paper, I provide causal empirical evidence on this behavior using data from Brazilian mayoral elections and a regression discontinuity design. The findings indicate that marginal incumbents—those elected by a small vote margin—produce more concentrated campaign manifestos than challengers who narrowly lost. Moreover, incumbents belonging to cohesive and programmatic parties tend to emphasize party-specific issues more strongly, suggesting that reputation plays an important role in issue selection. To measure issue emphasis and manifesto concentration, I leverage a unique database of more than 28,000 political manifestos and apply a Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) algorithm to estimate a vector of topics—or the issues emphasized by each candidate. Using this information, I calculate Herfindahl-Hirschman indices (HHI) to assess the degree of issue concentration in campaign manifestos.

Suggested Citation

  • Leila Pereira, 2026. "Play to Your Strengths: Incumbency Effect and Issue Emphasis in Brazilian Local Elections," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2026_13, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
  • Handle: RePEc:spa:wpaper:2026wpecon13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.repec.eae.fea.usp.br/documentos/Pereira_13WP.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • P00 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spa:wpaper:2026wpecon13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pedro Garcia Duarte The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Pedro Garcia Duarte to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuspbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.