IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/snd/wpaper/14.html

Can Participatory Watershed Management be sustained? Evidence from Southern India

Author

Listed:
  • D. Suresh Kumar

Abstract

Watershed development is a very important rural development programme in India. This paper studies 60 community groups in 12 micro-watersheds in South India to understand how villagers cooperate to manage watershed related tasks. The paper examines the factors that affect collective participation in watershed management and how cooperation changes once the State withdraws and hands control over management to panchayat raj institutions and other groups. The study finds that watershed institutions in most cases become inactive once the project period is over. The analysis of factors that influence on-going maintenance of watershed structures indicates that collective action emerges when user groups are small and homogenous and communities are dependent on a large number of wells. Wealthy user groups are likely to be more active when a project is on-going. The results suggest that watershed development should be given more emphasis where wells are the predominant source of irrigation. Further, greater success is likely where user groups have more knowledge and control over funds available for maintenance activities after the state withdraws.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Suresh Kumar, "undated". "Can Participatory Watershed Management be sustained? Evidence from Southern India," Working papers 14, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:snd:wpaper:14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sandeeonline.org/uploads/documents/publication/762_PUB_working_paper_suresh22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.sandeeonline.org/uploads/documents/abstract/762_ABS_abstract_22.pdfFile-FormatABS:application/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:snd:wpaper:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anuradhak The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Anuradhak to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.