IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/upaper/009sn.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Cornerstone Imprint of Kandinsky in the History of Abstract Art

Author

Listed:
  • Samah Nassar

    (October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Cairo, Egypt)

Abstract

With all forms of art being continually subjective in the process by which they are perceived and appreciated, abstract art has been no exception, facing both elicited support and criticism over the years. The greatest debate on abstract art was experienced over a century ago when the art first emerged, that is in its initial stages of development. A century ago, abstract art signified a new perception of art that was conceived and accepted only by a few people. However, the art later transformed to be accepted by many as one of the purest and most beautiful forms of art, a change that was brought about through the works and ideas presented by Wassily Kandinsky. Kandinsky had, through his artistic vision and modes of expression, led to a critical revolution in the way abstract art was visualized and conceived. Therefore, he had not only helped lay the robust foundation that governed many of the concepts in abstract art, in contemporary and modern times, but he had also helped revolutionize its framework enriching it with the elements it still carries to the modern day.

Suggested Citation

  • Samah Nassar, 2020. "The Cornerstone Imprint of Kandinsky in the History of Abstract Art," Proceedings of the 20th International RAIS Conference, December 6-7, 2020 009sn, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:upaper:009sn
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/009SN.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Abstract art; Kandinsky; Avant-garde; Contemporary art;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:upaper:009sn. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.