IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/raiswp/0658.html

Evaluating Control-Based AI Governance in Cybersecurity GRC Programs: An Expert Assessment Study

Author

Listed:
  • Miranda Stanfield

    (Capitol Technology University, Laurel, MD, USA)

Abstract

This study proposes and evaluates the Lifecycle-Integrated AI Governance Control Framework (LIAGCF), a Design Science Research artifact that maps 16 administrative, technical, and operational AI governance controls across seven lifecycle phases. Each control aligns to NIST AI RMF core functions and NIST SP 800-53 control families within a unified enterprise cybersecurity GRC architecture. Structured expert review (N = 10) validated NIST AI RMF structural alignment (9 of 10) and confirmed SP 800-53 control family assignments as technically defensible (7 of 10). Lifecycle coverage was validated as comprehensive, and the framework was affirmed as a meaningful contribution to AI governance scholarship. Theoretically, the LIAGCF addresses a documented structural gap as the first lifecycle-integrated, control-categorized governance framework to operationalize both NIST AI RMF core functions and NIST SP 800-53 control families within a unified architecture, bridging the persistent disconnect between strategic AI risk oversight and operational cybersecurity enforcement. In practice, the LIAGCF equips GRC practitioners, CISOs, and federal risk management program leads with a standards-aligned, auditable governance structure that operationalizes AI risk management intent as assignable, lifecycle-anchored controls, with designated implementation artifact requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Miranda Stanfield, 2026. "Evaluating Control-Based AI Governance in Cybersecurity GRC Programs: An Expert Assessment Study," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2025 0658, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/0658.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.