IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/raiswp/0590.html

Strategic Staffing Models for Solo Telehealth Psychology Practices: An Applied Case Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Joe Delgado

    (University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, USA)

Abstract

Rising demand in solo telehealth psychology practices requires balancing growth with limited time, supervision, and financial resources. This anonymized case study examined a U.S.-based solo practice evaluating three staffing models: a practicum student, a postdoctoral fellow, or a licensed psychologist. The objective was to expand client capacity while preserving care quality and financial viability. Using practice records, guidelines, labor data, and supervision requirements, the analysis compared supervision burden, revenue potential, and sustainability across models. Findings showed practicum students had the lowest direct cost but required intensive supervision, limiting overall capacity. Postdoctoral fellows emerged as a sustainable staffing configuration, offering financial feasibility and moderate independence. Licensed psychologists provided autonomy and billing flexibility but carried the highest financial risk. The case suggests staffing choices must weigh financial tradeoffs alongside the owner’s supervision capacity. For resource-constrained solo practitioners, the study offers a framework for testing staffing models before implementation. Aligning staffing strategy with clinical and financial realities enables solo telehealth practices to pursue sustainable growth while supporting workforce development.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe Delgado, 2025. "Strategic Staffing Models for Solo Telehealth Psychology Practices: An Applied Case Analysis," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2025 0590, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/0590.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.