IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/raiswp/0588.html

Dangerous Delusions: Towards a Psychology of Neoliberal Ideological Beliefs in the Ecological, Social, and Political Polycrisis

Author

Listed:
  • Severin Hornung

    (University of Innsbruck, Austria)

  • Thomas Hoge

    (University of Innsbruck, Austria)

  • Christine Unterrainer

    (University of Innsbruck, Austria)

Abstract

This presentation reports a first wave of studies from a research program on the psychological significance of neoliberal ideology in the socio-politico-ecological polycrisis. Neoliberalism not only enforces globally dominant political-economic practices of market expansion, entrepreneurial freedom, dismantling the welfare state, and supremacy of capital interests, but also pervades psychological processes, belief systems, and behaviors. After reviewing theoretical and methodological foundations on system-justifying neoliberal ideologies, exemplary empirical results are reported, pertaining to the ecological climate crisis, the social crisis of eroding civil solidarity, and the legitimation crisis of liberal democracies. All are addressed in survey studies using the neoliberal ideological beliefs questionnaire with sub-dimensions of individualism, competition, and instrumentality. The first study examined relationships with system justification, environmental consciousness, climate-protective behavior, and estimated carbon footprint, confirming a detrimental role of neoliberal ideological beliefs. The second study established connections between neoliberal ideological beliefs, moral disengagement, and lacking civic engagement for people seeking refuge. The third study explored correlational patterns of neoliberal beliefs, political attitudes, and party preferences, showing a tendency towards right-wing populism and social dominance orientation. Additionally, qualitative interviews were conducted among socio-economically disadvantaged groups. Contradicting their social interests, participants endorsed neoliberal individualism, competition, and instrumentality, evidenced by meritocratic explanations for poverty and rejection of wealth redistribution. Underlying psychological processes were reduction of cognitive dissonance and appeasement of epistemic and existential motives. Psychodynamics of neoliberal ideologies in the polycrisis are highlighted, including self-reinforcing spirals, corrosion of transformative capacities, and the xenophobic authoritarian turn. Implications for following waves of research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Severin Hornung & Thomas Hoge & Christine Unterrainer, 2025. "Dangerous Delusions: Towards a Psychology of Neoliberal Ideological Beliefs in the Ecological, Social, and Political Polycrisis," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2025 0588, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/0588.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas I. Palley, 2024. "Neoliberalism and the Drift to Proto-Fascism: Political and Economic Causes of the Crisis of Liberal Democracy," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 732-755, July.
    2. Stephan Pühringer & Walter O. Ötsch, 2018. "Neoliberalism and Right-wing Populism: Conceptual Analogies," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 193-203, April.
    3. Kommandeur, Querine & Alenda-Demoutiez, Juliette & Kaufmann, Maria & Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid, 2025. "Varieties of Anticapitalism: A systematic study of transformation strategies in alternative economic discourses," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    4. Fremstad, Anders & Paul, Mark, 2022. "Neoliberalism and climate change: How the free-market myth has prevented climate action," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Severin Hornung & Thomas Höge & Christine Unterrainer, 2021. "Ideologies at Work in Organizations: An Emerging Critical Perspective and Reflexive Research Agenda," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, in: Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Sofia Vale (ed.), Eurasian Business Perspectives, pages 165-182, Springer.
    6. Gregoris Ioannou, 2024. "Trapped in contradiction: Precariousness and the ideological orientations of younger workers in hospitality-related occupations," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(3), pages 891-913, August.
    7. Prabhat Patnaik, 2020. "Neoliberalism and Fascism," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 9(1), pages 33-49, April.
    8. Severin Hornung & Thomas Hoge & Christine Unterrainer, 2025. "Neoliberal Ideology versus Humanist Ideals: Political, Social, and Fantasmatic Logics," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Severin Hornung & Thomas Hoge & Christine Unterrainer & Lisa Seubert, 2025. "Internalized Neoliberal Ideology and Socio-Economic Precarity: A Qualitative Study on False Consciousness Among the Disadvantaged," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 65-92, December.
    2. David Benjamin Billedeau & Jeffrey Wilson & Naima Samuel, 2022. "From Responsibility to Requirement: COVID, Cars, and the Future of Corporate Social Responsibility in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Aagaard, Line Kryger, 2026. "More-than-capitalist economies: Insights from community supported agriculture, tiny houses and hitchhiking in Denmark," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. Mark Setterfield, 2025. "The COVID pandemic and its aftermath: missed opportunities for avoiding a future of Authoritarian Neoliberalism," Working Papers 2510, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    5. Zeynep Clulow & David M. Reiner, 2022. "Democracy, Economic Development and Low-Carbon Energy: When and Why Does Democratization Promote Energy Transition?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Oliver Braganza & Jakob Kapeller, 2025. "Reappraising consumption nudging—on liberty in the age of climate catastrophe," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. De Moortel, Deborah & Balogh, Rebeka & Engels, Miriam & Vanderleyden, Julie, 2025. "Employment quality and mental health in Germany: The mismatch of low employment quality with work and family values by gender," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    8. Severin Hornung & Thomas Hoge & Christine Unterrainer, 2025. "Neoliberal Ideology versus Humanist Ideals: Political, Social, and Fantasmatic Logics," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Jasper O. Kenter & Simone Martino & Sam J. Buckton & Sandra Waddock & Bina Agarwal & Annela Anger-Kraavi & Robert Costanza & Adam P. Hejnowicz & Peter Jones & Jordan O. Lafayette & Jane Kabubo-Mariara, 2025. "Ten principles for transforming economics in a time of global crises," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 837-847, July.
    10. Brown, Donal & Brisbois, Marie-Claire & Lacey-Barnacle, Max & Foxon, Tim & Copeland, Claire & Mininni, Giulia, 2023. "The Green New Deal: Historical insights and local prospects in the United Kingdom (UK)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Stefan Sumah & Anze Sumah, 2022. "Questioning on Several Forms of Fascism," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 26, pages 104-115, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.