IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/raiswp/0565.html

Building a Structured Reasoning AI Model for Legal Judgment in Telehealth Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyuan Xu

    (University of the Cumberlands, Kentucky, USA)

Abstract

This paper introduces a structured AI framework developed to support legal decision-making in telehealth environments. Most existing systems either rely on user declarations or conduct audits after the fact. Our model takes a different approach: it integrates legal reasoning into the AI’s core logic. The system is built on an architecture that includes structured semantic modeling, executable legal logic, and role-specific response generation. Beyond enabling real-time legality checks, the model also accounts for ambiguity in legal language by incorporating fuzzy clauses, confidence scores, and guidance pathways that reflect varying levels of legal certainty. Instead of treating compliance as a checklist imposed from outside, the model treats it as something that unfolds from within the system's logic. The result is an AI that can explain its decisions, adapt to legal environments, and support institutional accountability. This work offers a new perspective on how AI can operate not just as a tool, but as a responsible actor in regulated clinical systems, and points to new directions for designing legally responsive telehealth platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyuan Xu, 2025. "Building a Structured Reasoning AI Model for Legal Judgment in Telehealth Systems," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2025 0565, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/0565.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.