Framing Dignity in the Debate on Requested Death

Requested death raises ethical questions about autonomy, dignity, and protecting vulnerable populations. This paper defines 'requested death' as patient-initiated end-of-life practices, including PAS (where the physician provides but does not administer the means), euthanasia (where the provider performs the act), and death with dignity laws (which permit self-administered aid under certain conditions). This study uses Charmaz’s grounded theory and Rhoades and Rhoads’ discourse analysis to examine how both sides use narrative framing and advocacy to shape policy and public opinion. Supporters emphasize autonomy and compassion. Critics stress risks to marginalized groups and appeal to shared responsibility. The analysis uses media, legal, organizational, and personal sources to examine how the meanings of dignity are constructed and contested. The findings advocate policies that address individual and structural factors in end-of-life care.