IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/kpaper/0023ocm.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Importance of Reconstitution as a Criminalistics Tactical Procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Oancea Clara Maria

    (Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University of Bucharest)

Abstract

The advantages of reconstitution in finding out the truth, the necessary requirement for obtaining a fair criminal conviction, are undeniable, of which it is noticeable to carry out the verification directly by the judicial body regarding the possibility of committing the criminal facts, in the way in which they were claimed by denunciation, complaint or the notification of ex officio, and of the perception of these criminal facts by the eyewitnesses or the persons directly involved in their commission. With the help of this tactical procedure, a series of questionable evidence or simple indications can be confirmed or removed, which, in the absence of the reconstitution, would make the investigation more difficult than it would help the criminal investigation bodies. In any case, the conclusions of a reconstitution, like any other means of proof in the criminal process, do not have a special probative value, by themselves, but must be appreciated and analyzed in relation to the other evidence administered in the criminal case, as required by the rules established in par. 97 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Oancea Clara Maria, 2020. "The Importance of Reconstitution as a Criminalistics Tactical Procedure," Proceedings of the 16th International RAIS Conference, March 30-31, 2020 0023ocm, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:kpaper:0023ocm
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/0023OCM.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reconstitution; tactical procedure; eyewitness; criminal investigation; criminal facts; truth; criminal conviction; judicial body; evidence; rules;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:kpaper:0023ocm. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.