IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sip/dpaper/08-019.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Taste-based Discrimination: Empirical Evidence from a Shock to Preferences during WWI

Author

Listed:
  • Petra Moser

    (Department of Economics, Stanford University)

Abstract

A significant challenge to empirically testing theories of discrimination has been the difficulty of identifying taste-based discrimination and of distinguishing it clearly from statistical discrimination. This paper identifies taste-based discrimination through a two-part empirical test. First, it constructs quantitative measures of revealed preferences, which establish that World War I created a persistent change in ethnic preferences that switched the status of German Americans from a mainstream ethnicity to an ethnic minority until the late 1920s. Second, the paper uses this shock to preferences to identify the effects of taste-based discrimination on traders at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). A new data set of more than 5,000 applications for membership in the NYSE reveals that the War more than doubled the probability that applicants with German-sounding names would be rejected (relative to Anglo-Saxons). Creation Date: 2009-01 Revision Date:

Suggested Citation

  • Petra Moser, "undated". "Taste-based Discrimination: Empirical Evidence from a Shock to Preferences during WWI," Discussion Papers 08-019, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:08-019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/repec/sip/08-019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Taste-Based Discrimination; World War I; Shock to Preferences;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J15 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:08-019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Shor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cestaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.