IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Politics and Economics of Implementing State-Sponsored Embryonic Stem-Cell Research


  • Roger G. Noll

    (Stanford University)


Human embryonic stem cell research has become both controversial and salient as a political issue. Limitations on federal support for this research that were announced by the President on August 9, 2001. These limitations have given rise to several state-sponsored research programs, most notably the $3 billion program enacted by California voters as Proposition 71 in November 2004. This essay examines the problems that states face in implementing a successful basic research program. Some of these problems are shared with other research projects having commercial potential, such as a the danger of “pork barrel” effects and the problem of accommodating confidential peer review, which is necessary to obtain candid assessment of research proposals, with the special problems associated with this program: a narrow focus (which really is an example of the otherwise inefficient practice pf “earmarking” government research expenditures), an unresolvable state of bitter public and political controversy, and an unrealistic perception by political leaders and the general public that this research will produce substantial short-run therapeutic results and financial payoffs. This essay examines these problems in detail and evaluates the extent to which the organizational structure of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine is likely to be an effective response to these problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger G. Noll, 2005. "The Politics and Economics of Implementing State-Sponsored Embryonic Stem-Cell Research," Discussion Papers 04-028, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:04-028

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:04-028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Anne Shor). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.