IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sfu/sfudps/dp99-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Eeast Asia Through a Glass Darkly: Disparate Lenses on the Road to Damascus

Author

Listed:
  • Dean, J.W.

Abstract

East Asia Through a Glass Darkly: Disparate Lenses on the Road to Damascus" This paper asks whether the Asian Crisis was a failure of Asian capitalism, or a failure of market capitalism. It begins with a stylized chronology of events that is broadly consistent with either hypothesis. It then re-tells the story, first through an "Asian failure" lens, and next through a "market failure" lens. The paper concludes by reporting what theoretical and policy consensus has so far emerged within the economics profession, as well as the quandaries that remain.

Suggested Citation

  • Dean, J.W., 1999. "Eeast Asia Through a Glass Darkly: Disparate Lenses on the Road to Damascus," Discussion Papers dp99-3, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
  • Handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp99-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    FINANCIAL MARKET ; ECONOMIC CRISIS;

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp99-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Working Paper Coordinator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desfuca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.