IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sfu/sfudps/dp26-12.html

Urgency, Liquidity, and the Price of Convenience

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The conventional approach to measuring a convenience yield or liquidity premium is to take two assets that differ in convenience or liquidity but are otherwise identical, and to proxy the price of convenience (PoC) with their spread. We show that this approach is insufficient. First, short-term assets are inherently liquid for non-urgent needs, therefore a spread between them reflects urgency of needs rather than liquidity of assets. Second, any spread reflects the underlying assets loadings on convenience rather than convenience itself. To solve these problems, we develop a monetary asset pricing model and estimate it with three instruments that differ in maturity and in marketability: Treasury bills, commercial paper, and AAA corporate bonds. At our headline estimate, the PoC averages 5.1% a year and varies between 3.2% and 11.4% - an order of magnitude above conventional measures - and a private claim delivers on average about half the liquidity services of a Treasury bill. On average, only 24% of the PoC is attributable to urgency.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Herrenbrueck & Xinhao Dong & Zijian Wang, 2026. "Urgency, Liquidity, and the Price of Convenience," Discussion Papers dp26-12, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
  • Handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp26-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sfu.ca/repec-econ/sfu/sfudps/dp26-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp26-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Working Paper Coordinator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desfuca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.