IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sfu/sfudps/dp26-01.html

Specification Choice in Local Projections: Evidence from Monetary Policy Shocks

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Fortier

    (PhD Candidate, Simon Fraser University)

Abstract

This study examines how specification choices in local projections influence the estimation of impulse responses to monetary policy shocks. Using monthly U.S. data from 1983 to 2007 and the Aruoba and Drechsel (2024) shock series, I systematically compare levels and long-differences specifications across 12 control sets and multiple lag lengths. The results are evaluated both qualitatively by benchmarking impulse responses against theory, standard beliefs, and prior evidence and quantitatively, using information criteria (AIC, BIC, CV). The findings show that the long-differences specification produces distorted long-term dynamics. In contrast, the levels specification, when paired with a robust control set, generates well-behaved responses. These results stress the importance of careful specification and provide practical guidance for researchers applying local projections to monetary policy shocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Fortier, 2026. "Specification Choice in Local Projections: Evidence from Monetary Policy Shocks," Discussion Papers dp26-01, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
  • Handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp26-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sfu.ca/repec-econ/sfu/sfudps/dp26-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sfu:sfudps:dp26-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Working Paper Coordinator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desfuca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.