IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/9912285.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Auditing and Trust Relationship between auditors and client?s management: Case study of Tanzanian Local Governments

Author

Listed:
  • Abeid Francis Gaspar

    (Institute of Finance Management)

Abstract

This paper examines the interaction between auditing and the trust relationship between external auditors and members of management in the context of Tanzanian Local Government Authorities (TLGAs). The study employs an interpretive research methodology. The empirical data was gathered through in-depth interviews with the auditors and the members of management from the two TLGAs. Other sources of data included review of relevant documents and observation. The study found that trust relationship between the auditors and management play a crucial role in the auditing process. It has also revealed that both the auditors and members of management employed various strategies to manage mutual trust perceptions in the course of auditing. This influenced audit procedures as well as outcomes. The study contributes to the empirical auditing literature on trust, particularly in the context of public sector entities. The findings show that trust relationship between auditors and client?s management is likely to influence efficiency in the auditing process.

Suggested Citation

  • Abeid Francis Gaspar, 2019. "Auditing and Trust Relationship between auditors and client?s management: Case study of Tanzanian Local Governments," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 9912285, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:9912285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/international-academic-conference-barcelona/table-of-content/detail?cid=99&iid=023&rid=12285
    File Function: First version, 2019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Auditing; Trust; Tanzania; Local governments; Grounded theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:9912285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.