IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/9811803.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Validation of the Danish Birth Registration

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Kristensen

    (University of Copenhagen)

Abstract

We assessed validity and reliability of data on four serious pregnancy complications and gestational age in two national registers, the Medical Birth Register (MBR) and the National Register of Hospital Discharges (NRHD). From a cohort of all women in Denmark who gave birth to their first and second singleton infant in 1982-1987, a review was made of a selected sample of 1662 medical records. Regarding registration of pregnancy complications, there was good agreement (kappa above 0.6) between medical records and the registers, and between the registers. However, there was a tendency toward understatement evidenced by low sensitivity of three of four pregnancy complications. The level of agreement (43%) for length of gestation was disappointing. The number of systematic and nonsystematic errors indicate that there was about 52% more singleton preterm deliveries in Denmark in 1982 than previously reported (6.9% instead of 4.5%). It is concluded that the validity of the Danish birth registers should be improved by explicit definitions, increased use of raw data, and data collection by motivated professionals at birth.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Kristensen, 2019. "Validation of the Danish Birth Registration," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 9811803, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:9811803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/iises-international-academic-conference-dubrovnik/table-of-content/detail?cid=98&iid=025&rid=11803
    File Function: First version, 2019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Epidemiologi; preterm; registerstudy;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:9811803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.