IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/8209848.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Status and Analyses of Social Economy in Gimhae-si, South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Minji Kim

    (Inje University)

  • Euitay Jung

    (Inje University)

Abstract

Social economy has received attention as an inclusive growth model which solves various social problems and at the same time, responds to structural low growth. Especially, it has appeared as an alternative to solve social problems including the high rate of unemployment, job insecurity, and the gap between the rich and the poor as it was selected as one of 100 national agendas for state affairs government projects since the inauguration of the new government. In Korea, people are growing more and more interested in social economy as the legal bases related to social economy including ?the Social Enterprise Promotion Act? in 2007 and ?the Framework Act on cooperatives? in 2012 were prepared. And it has become increasingly important in Gimhae. Gimhae first enacted an ordinance for revitalizing social economy in Gyeongsangsnam-do to do community projects by supporting social enterprises? foundation and development and will first establish a ?social economy support center? in the Yeongnam area. This study tries to analyze the characteristics and support policies of social economy in Gimhae by doing its theory and the general status of its organizations including social enterprises, cooperatives, community-based enterprises, and self-support companies in it. For current social economy of Gimhae, the number of businesses is lower than that of other local governments and it is still at a rudimentary stage despite great efforts to develop it. Therefore, the study tries to provide basic materials of social economy in Gimhae and seek for solutions to develop and revitalize it in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Minji Kim & Euitay Jung, 2018. "Status and Analyses of Social Economy in Gimhae-si, South Korea," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 8209848, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:8209848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/39th-international-academic-conference-amsterdam/table-of-content/detail?cid=82&iid=021&rid=9848
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gimhae-si; social economy; policy;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:8209848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.