IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/8209551.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Global Citizenship: Reality versus Aspiration

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas J. Ward

    (University of Bridgeport)

Abstract

Those who teach ?global citizenship? appear to operate on the assumption that a world republic already exists with its own guiding principles and norms. While beneficiaries of national citizenship inherit both rights and duties, no enforceable ?social contract? delineates ?global citizens?? rights and duties. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the document repeatedly referenced by ?global citizenship?? aspirants, has only limited enforceability, given its status as a declaration rather than a treaty. The United Kingdom?s referendum against continued European Union membership as well as the United States? willingness to abandon extant trade norms and protocols challenge the assumption that the world is ripe for global consensus, consolidation and citizenship. Indeed, we seem to remain distant not only from ?global citizenship??s assumed ?world republic? but from what Jurgen Habermas envisioned and described as shared ?world domestic policy.? ?Global citizenship? education per se does not conform with today?s sociopolitical realities. The authority and expertise attributed to its purveyors warrant critical assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas J. Ward, 2018. "Global Citizenship: Reality versus Aspiration," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 8209551, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:8209551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/40th-international-academic-conference-stockholm/table-of-content/detail?cid=65&iid=070&rid=9551
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Global Citizenship; Rights and Duties; National Citizenship; Perpetual Peace; Universal Declaration of Human Rights; Social Contract; Failed State;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:8209551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.