IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/4006296.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A comparative study on nuclear energy policy decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Tae Seok Yong

    () (KISTEP(Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning))

Abstract

Today many countries are operating nuclear power plants. According to the 2014 IAEA report, there are 438 operational nuclear power reactors in 30 countries. By the way, there has been a change of nuclear energy policy decision-making in many countries after Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. Following the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Germany shut down the old generation of nuclear reactors and pledged to close the rest by 2022. Switzerland has banned the construction of new reactors. Belgium is considering phasing out its nuclear plants. On the other hand, France decided to extend the life of existing nuclear reactors. A fifth new reactor is under construction in Finland(https://en.wikipedia.org).How can national nuclear energy policy decision-making to the same external shock be so different? This study attempts to answer this question. First of all, this study examines determinants influencing on nuclear energy policy decision-making, such as energy security, climate change, public acceptance, etc. And this study discovers that the complex causal condition of the determinants of policy decision-making. This study is expected to give substantive and comprehensive information for nuclear energy policy decision makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tae Seok Yong, 2016. "A comparative study on nuclear energy policy decision-making," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 4006296, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:4006296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/24th-international-academic-conference-barcelona/table-of-content/detail?cid=40&iid=098&rid=6296
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    nuclear energy; policy decision-making; policy change; comparative study;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:4006296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Klara Cermakova). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.